Home   |   Companies   |   Browse News   |   Subscribe   |   IIA   |   ACI   |   RMIA   |   Events   |   Awards  
Search Site


RM Directory
Anti Money Laundering
Associations
Brokers
Business Continuity
Compliance & Legal
Compliance & Risk Software
Education & Training
ERM
Insurance companies and services
IT Security & Fraud
OH&S
Recruitment
Regulators
Risk Advisory
Security
 
 
 
 
 
Industry Links
LexisNexis
Human Resources
Lawyers Weekly
 
  NewsSeptember 10, 2010
Gender diversity reporting to challenge Boards

 
Australian companies will need to report on progress against gender diversity targets as of January 2011 under recent changes to the ASX Corporate Governance Council guidelines, however, many Boards have not yet had the discussion on how to set measurable objectives in this area.

ASX listed companies will need to disclose in their annual report statistics on their achievement against gender objectives set by their Board as well as the proportion of women on the Board, in senior management and employed throughout the whole organisation, under the changes recommended by the ASX Corporate Governance Council.

The changes also stipulate that Boards set up an appropriate committee for recommending strategies to address Board diversity, considering diversity in succession planning and having a charter that regularly reviews the proportion of women at all levels in the company.

However, recent research from Chartered Secretaries Australia (CSA) found that 77 per cent of Australian companies do not have a diversity policy in place.

As such, companies will need assistance in implementing gender diversity strategies in order to address gender imbalance at board and senior executive level in the future, according to CSA.

“Substantial work needs to be done on undertaking diversity audits to understand the areas of inequality that exist in companies, and developing a business case that addresses both the diversity challenges and business opportunities,” said Tim Sheehy, CEO of CSA.

“Boards will also need to examine their director recruitment processes, including their selection criteria, to ensure a diverse range of candidates is considered.”

The 2009/2010 Benchmarking Governance in Practice in Australia survey also found that there is still no clear consensus in the ASX top 200 companies about how best to structure Boards when dealing with risk management.

Almost one-third of companies believe that having a stand-alone risk committee is ideal for companies, with another third believing it best to combine risk with audit and the remainder seeing it as the role of the Board as a whole.





21 July 2010

Send this article to colleague/friend

 

Home |  News Archive |  Advertising |  About Us |  Contact Us |  Privacy Policy

Copyright © Reed Business Information. All material on this site is subject to copyright. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be reproduced, translated, transmitted, framed or stored in a retrieval system for public or private use without the written permission of the publisher.

eNewsletter
 
enter email to register/unregister
2010
Media Kit